Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Potito Starace vs Thiemo De Bakker Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Starace vs Bakker analysis and find out who is favored!
Potito Starace vs Thiemo De Bakker Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Starace 0 - 0 Bakker
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Starace has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Bakker has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Starace, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Bakker has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Starace has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Bakker has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Starace has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Bakker winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Starace has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 62% (W/L 394/ 242), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 22% (W/L 4/ 14). Bakker has their best career surface win % on , winning % (W/L / ), and worse career win % on , winning % (W/L / ).
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Starace has played against opponents with an average rank of while Bakker has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Starace has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Bakker has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Starace has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Bakker has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
N/A
Rank
High
42
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
35
Age
R
Plays
L
W
W
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
Form
Career Total W/L
YTD W/L
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
YTD Titles
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Potito Starace vs Thiemo De Bakker For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Starace VS Bakker
Sportsbook
Offer
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Potito Starace | Thiemo De Bakker |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Aces pg | 0 | 1st Match |
| Aces Total | 0 | 1st Match |
| DFs per game | 0 | 1st Match |
| DFs Total | 0 | 1st Match |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 1st Match |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Potito Starace Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Gianluca Naso
Player
Potito Starace
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve %
77%
(
62 of
81)
8
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
83%
(
35 of
42)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
42 of
62)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
17%
(
2 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
25%
(
15 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
31 of
81)
77
Total Points Won
65
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Maximo Gonzalez
Player
Potito Starace
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve %
57%
(
38 of
67)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
40%
(
21 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
36 of
67)
67
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Potito Starace
Player
Chase Buchanan
80%
(
32 of
40)
1st Serve %
63%
(
34 of
54)
3
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
63%
(
20 of
32)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
75%
(
6 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
3 of
20)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
35%
(
14 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
34 of
54)
60
Total Points Won
34
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Potito Starace
Player
Yoshihito Nishioka
69%
(
46 of
67)
1st Serve %
60%
(
56 of
93)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
35 of
56)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
14 of
37)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
34%
(
23 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
44 of
93)
88
Total Points Won
72
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Victor Hanescu
Player
Potito Starace
71%
(
56 of
79)
1st Serve %
77%
(
64 of
83)
8
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
0
82%
(
46 of
56)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
44 of
64)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
79%
(
15 of
19)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
27%
(
21 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
24 of
83)
82
Total Points Won
80
|
6-4 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Aljaz Bedene
Player
Potito Starace
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve %
68%
(
43 of
63)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
10 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
63)
63
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Potito Starace
Player
Kyle Edmund
72%
(
48 of
67)
1st Serve %
61%
(
31 of
51)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
31%
(
21 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
17 of
51)
63
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Potito Starace
Player
Andrej Martin
67%
(
72 of
108)
1st Serve %
58%
(
49 of
84)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
5
58%
(
42 of
72)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
32 of
49)
58%
(
21 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
42%
(
45 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
36 of
84)
99
Total Points Won
93
|
6-0 4-6 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Potito Starace
Player
Konstantin Kravchuk
59%
(
44 of
75)
1st Serve %
61%
(
54 of
89)
3
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
3
82%
(
36 of
44)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
41 of
54)
74%
(
23 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
21%
(
16 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
27 of
89)
86
Total Points Won
78
|
7-6(2) 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Filip Krajinovic
Player
Potito Starace
72%
(
62 of
86)
1st Serve %
77%
(
74 of
96)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
0
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
47 of
74)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
14 of
22)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
35%
(
30 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
35 of
96)
91
Total Points Won
91
|
3-6 7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Thiemo De Bakker Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Etienne Donnet
Player
Thiemo de Bakker
58%
(
46 of
79)
1st Serve %
50%
(
44 of
88)
8
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
1
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
70%
(
23 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
27%
(
21 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
33 of
88)
91
Total Points Won
76
|
7-6(7) 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Thiemo de Bakker
Player
Florian Broska
58%
(
48 of
83)
1st Serve %
47%
(
40 of
86)
9
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
5
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
30 of
40)
63%
(
22 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
27 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
29 of
86)
85
Total Points Won
84
|
6-4 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Thiemo de Bakker
Player
Cyril Vandermeersch
66%
(
47 of
71)
1st Serve %
61%
(
41 of
67)
7
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
3
79%
(
37 of
47)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
27 of
41)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
69%
(
18 of
26)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
23 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
22 of
67)
70
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Thiemo de Bakker
Player
Niklas Waldner
56%
(
29 of
52)
1st Serve %
55%
(
38 of
69)
3
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
2
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
84%
(
32 of
38)
87%
(
20 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
9 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
26 of
69)
69
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Arthur Gea
Player
Thiemo de Bakker
56%
(
39 of
70)
1st Serve %
66%
(
49 of
74)
4
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
3
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
36 of
49)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
24 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
30 of
74)
76
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Oleg Prihodko
Player
Thiemo de Bakker
60%
(
57 of
95)
1st Serve %
61%
(
58 of
95)
8
Aces
11
3
Double Faults
1
74%
(
42 of
57)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
43 of
58)
63%
(
24 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
31%
(
29 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
32 of
95)
98
Total Points Won
92
|
4-6 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Buvaysar Gadamauri
Player
Thiemo de Bakker
51%
(
32 of
63)
1st Serve %
39%
(
23 of
59)
2
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
4
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
15 of
23)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
37%
(
23 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
69
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Thiemo de Bakker
Player
Toby Martin
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve %
49%
(
19 of
39)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
65%
(
17 of
26)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
5%
(
1 of
20)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
38%
(
15 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
72%
(
28 of
39)
52
Total Points Won
26
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Federico Iannaccone
Player
Thiemo de Bakker
72%
(
55 of
76)
1st Serve %
56%
(
61 of
108)
5
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
1
82%
(
45 of
55)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
39 of
61)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
18%
(
2 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
21%
(
16 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
43 of
108)
103
Total Points Won
81
|
3-6 7-6(2) 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Starace Vs Bakker Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Starace are available here and Bakker photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
